Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay ahead with the latest news from the academy, free school & UTC sector
James Croft

Does partnership really lead to improvement?

New research questions link between school collaboration and educational performance

Posted by Stephanie Broad | November 04, 2015 | People, policy, politics

A new study, published by the Centre for the Study of Market Reform of Education (CMRE), finds that despite the popular rhetoric around collaboration in education, there is a lack of robust evidence to show what impact this has for improving pupil attainment. 

In a literature review conducted by CMRE Executive Director James Croft, the CMRE paper shows that the majority of analysis celebrating the positive impact of collaboration is qualitative and focuses on staff development and networking opportunities, rather than pupils’ outcomes.

The paper goes on to highlight the important difference between collaboration and chain and federation effects. Whilst the language of collaboration is often used around multi-academy trusts, formal school groups are structurally merged and integrated. Recent research in this area, although unable to draw causal inferences, has opened up positive lines of enquiry. However, the CMRE study proposes that where chains appear to be making a difference to pupil outcomes ‘the effect may be attributable to the influence of corporatisation, rather than any collaboration effect’, with scale freeing resources for investment in quality control.

Commenting on the research, Tim Oates, Group Director of Assessment Research and Development for Cambridge Assessment said: “All too frequently, policy elements which should form part of a complex, interconnected set of actions and objectives take on a life of their own. They become ends in themselves – something to be achieved at all cost. School “collaboration” has all the hallmarks of entering a phase of mutation into an “end in itself”.

“This sophisticated review is a vital corrective to “collaboration” as a sloganistic pre-occupation divorced from the moral and technical aims which should lie at the heart of modern improvement strategy.”

James Croft, the report author and Executive Director of CMRE, added: “In a complex sector with multiple initiatives and structures at play, it is clear that we as a research community have much more work to do to assess the relative influence of interventions.

“This paper shows that we don’t yet know enough about the efficacy of school collaboration, to distinguish it from the underlying effects of school autonomy and competition.” 

What do you think about school collaboration? Do you have quantifiable results from partnering with other schools? Send your stories to us.

Read the executive summary here.

www.cmre.org.uk    

Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay ahead with the latest news from the academy, free school & UTC sector

Related stories

The answer to the meaning of MATs

Reality check

Leadership key to edtech success

Why budget cuts don't need to spell the end of edtech

How can we continue to engage girls in STEM?

Collaborating for innovation in edtech

Education, education, education! (and technology!)

MATs spend less on expenses and more on teaching staff

Education's IT Thing

Recycling modular buildings

Market place - view all

Britcab

Need a portable cabin or modular building?

We sell and hire ...

OKI

OKI is a global B2B printer manufacturer dedicated to creating cost...

Tech Data

As one of the world's largest wholesale distributors of technology,...

School Blazer

Schoolblazer is the leading supplier of high quality uniforms to t...

Haines Watts

Haines Watts can provide you with more than just a set of books at ...

Fujitsu

Fujitsu provide information technology solutions for businesses inc...