Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay ahead with the latest news from the academy, free school & UTC sector
James Croft: "At the core of Ofsted’s credibility problem is that it has developed far in advance of what we really know about what works for improving pupil attainment."

The trouble with inspection reform

Ofsted may learn to pick its battles more carefully but is still fighting a war it cannot win, says James Croft

Posted by Stephanie Broad | June 30, 2015 | People, policy, politics

Ofsted is still fighting a war it cannot win to justify the high stakes nature of inspection. The decision to move to inspecting outstanding schools only as necessary, where data or whistleblowing reveals a cause for concern, was sound; shorter, more focused inspections follow from this and seem sensible; in theory this means that resources may be deployed where they are needed most.

But to what end? Ofsted’s never really been clear about whether it’s there merely to identify failure, describe it, and/or to instigate action towards improvement - which requires direction. Identifying the priorities is one thing; knowing what to do about it is another. Getting to the bottom of why a school’s results might have gone into decline, or even the reasons for failure, and who should be held responsible, isn’t straightforward. While there is evidence that negative judgements generally prompt decisive effort to figure out what’s gone wrong and how to fix it, the reports themselves hardly inform that process.

Confusion on this question has over the years led to vacillation between over-reliance on exam performance data on the one hand (leading to questions about the value it adds), and individual inspectors’ judgments on the other (leading to problems of inconsistency). Unfortunately, the institution is now so inured to its critics that its leaders now respond to charges of unreliability merely by brashly asserting the organisation’s authority: so a rise in the proportion of schools judged to be good or outstanding ‘proves’ that tougher inspection ‘galvanises improvement’. Now that it’s decided to take service provision back in house, there’s even less contestability too.

At the core of Ofsted’s credibility problem is that it has developed far in advance of what we really know about what works for improving pupil attainment. Until the general paucity of evidence around much what is taken as best practice in schools is recognised, and we are prepared for a fundamental root and branch review of arrangements on this basis, it’s difficult to be optimistic about the prospect of genuinely impactful inspection reform. The consequences for school leaders’ motivation for challenge could be devastating.

James Croft is Director at the Centre for the Study of Market Reform of Education

www.cmre.org.uk    

Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay ahead with the latest news from the academy, free school & UTC sector

Related stories

Ofsted grades Kensington Aldridge Academy 'Outstanding'

Ofsted says Fairfield is going from strength to strength

Making money count for multi academy trusts

Ormiston Academies Trust appoints Nick Hudson as new CEO

Bristol Brunel Academy maintains 'Good' Ofsted grading

Three Peaks Primary Academy praised by Ofsted

Ash Trees Academy celebrates revival after Ofsted rating

Academies gather for national pupil wellbeing event

BESA in conversation with GL Assessment

How to challenge Ofsted reports

Market place - view all

Webanywhere

Education Solutions for your School
Webanywhere provide the pri...

Softcat

Leading IT infrastructure provider of software licensing, hardware...

Sherston

Sherston Software is a leading producer and publisher of software f...

Tech Data

As one of the world's largest wholesale distributors of technology,...

The Brookwood Partnership

Brookwood Partnership is the only owner operated contract catering ...

Rhino

Rhino is one of the leading rugby brands in the world and has beco...